a. Purpose
a) Improve
habitat for aquatic and terrestrial species
b) Improve hydrology
c) Improve water
quality in Hyper creek
d) Education/
research
e) Heighten public
awareness/ encourage use
b. Need
a) Address water
quality
b) Stem encroachment
of exotics not yet prevalent in JMNR (Bradford Pear, Black Locust for example)
c) Engage public
to ensure continued protected status
d) Improve native
species diversity
c. Goals
a) Improve hydrology/geomorphology
1) Transform ditch
to two stage ditch to accommodate flow while increasing bank angle and allowing
for establishment of riparian vegetation.
2) Add sinuosity
– reduce flashiness
b) Create riparian
zone of distinct species
c) Stem encroachment
of exotic invasive plant species that are not yet prevalent in JMNR.
1) Remove vegetation
from dumpsite
2) Install botanical
garden with green space to discourage reestablishment of invasive species.
d) Improve water
quality
1) Add small
wetland or ponds near Dave Ward
e) Increase instream
habitat heterogeneity
1) Add wood
f) Facilitate
public access to stream
1) New riparian
zone
2) Bend in
creek integrated with botanical garden installation
g) Create
public interest and encourage visits to restoration sites and JMNR
1) Install botanical
gardens
2) Engage stakeholders
to hold events/create unique space through art
h) Increase species
diversity
1) Kill
privet/Japanese honeysuckle along creek
2) Installation
of novel riparian ecosystem
3) Benthic macroinvertebrate
population; positive response to improved habitat/reduced flashiness.
i)
Education and research
1) Historic prairie
restoration
2) Native species
featured in garden beds
3) Data collections
and monitoring; post restoration
a) birds,
pollinators, plants, macro invertebrates, biofilm
b) Stream
bank stability/ stream bed heterogeneity
c) Water quality
d. Restoration
approach
a) partial
restoration (small prairie at dumpsite),
b) complete
alteration (dumpsite)
c) partial
construction (two stage ditch; wetland area near Dave Ward)
d) hybrid –
install riparian vegetation to create riparian zone
e) passive- species
residing in sections of creek downstream of restoration and wetlands will benefit from restoration.
e. Stakeholders
and quadrants addressed
a) City of
Conway – Campus considered big selling point.
b) General
Public
c) UCA Staff,
faculty, students in general
d) Gallery,
public art committee, art department
1) Possible venue
for exhibits and permanent installations
e) Music department
(possibly)
f) Faulkner
County Master gardeners (possibly)
g) UCA Board
of Directors
h) NRCS –
proposed wetlands would improve water quality headed towards Lake Conway.
Socio-Economic
Improve
water quality
Possible increase in property values
Proven
positive health effects from connecting with nature
(lots of supporting data).
(lots of supporting data).
Selling
point for Conway to draw in businesses
(increased employment; more revenue for city)
(increased employment; more revenue for city)
Ecological
Improved
nutrient cycling/ecosystem functions
Increase
in biodiversity
Improved
instream habitat
Control
of invasive exotics (try to anyway)
Cultural
Art/music
Garden
will be a place for public gatherings
Historic prairie/native plants in
beds
Personal
Garden/new
riparian area facilitates connection to nature
(pretty flowers;soothing waters)
(pretty flowers;soothing waters)
Repeated
use strengthens attachment
f. Project
duration and cost
a) 6 months
Is this compiled from the entire group? I'm confused as to which group since it overlaps with everyone. Is it just for the activities at the dump site? If so, I'd say keep out riparian/stream restoration for now, and talk to the other groups about implementing these things. Otherwise, it makes it too broad in its scope. Otherwise, looks like you are making good progress.
ReplyDeleteIt's not compiled, sorry I thought we were each expected to write ex. summary for overall project as means of comparison and then narrow focus for the rest of the outline.
ReplyDeleteIt's not compiled, sorry I thought we were each expected to write ex. summary for overall project as means of comparison and then narrow focus for the rest of the outline.
ReplyDeleteIt is probably easier to write the executive summary after you see everyone's progress this Monday or next. I don't remember how you all decided to write the summary, but it will definitely take class communication. Perhaps Steve and Aiden have already sent out instructions and I missed them. Not a big deal; we want to try to help keep you all focused on your projects right now to make sure they are on the right track.
ReplyDelete